FPM Moot-Points:

Tweet Me Please!

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Product Convergence or Incestuous Orgy in Alternatives - Part 1


With the mushrooming institutional growth of alternative investment managers, investment in the general partner is also an asset play. Such investments are separate from the conventional buying of hedge funds or other alternative vehicles as a limited partner. Private placements of alternative vehicles and fund manager transactions arena is a quietly burgeoning one, with dips. There are many global bank desks and specialised others (FPM follows Park Hill Group), who are placing and recommending hedge funds et al to global limited partner investors. At global banks within their Financial Institution Groups 'rain-makers' provide advisorial transactions in the actual management firms of theses hedge funds. (FPM follow veteran specialists like Norton Reamer at AMF and Berkshire Capital). We at FPM suggests the financial services focus in privately-held management firms is, industry-phase wise, more prevalent than M&A activity in listed / public asset management firms; even though one of the largest hedge fund managers is the UK-listed Man Group Plc with assets in excess of US$ 50 bn, and who have been at the helm of major transactions including mergers with GLG and FRM, over recent years.

M&A in fund managers, or as we dub it for broader scope ‘Fund Manager Transactions’ (FMT), is both endemic and reinforcing of growth and development of so called “alternatives investments”. Institutionalisation of initially boutique alternative management companies over the last 20-25 years has given hedge funds, private equity, real estate, infrastructure and commodity investments a wider investor-base through greater acceptance into pension, endowments and other public portfolios. Remember, initially these alternative vehicles existed for mainly high net worth individual’s or ultra-wealthy private family portfolios.

 There would be a different set of financial structuring and consequences were transactions occurring in the mature and declining phase of the alternatives industry. Instead, FPM notices transactions which are spawning hedge funds. Such spawns can become bubbles. The AOL and Time Warner merger at height of the Dotcom bubble is a reminder of unintended consequences of trendy transactions.   We feel a sense of a milieu’s seismic shift with outweighing negative outcome from this ‘splash’ phase of growth of alternative investment managers. The author understands that a ‘feeling’ comes before knowing,  but in financial terms FPM are flagging that asset-manager investments which are already reeling from the financial crisis shock, will generate widespread losses for the end-investor. As a case in point, Goldman Sachs’ private equity vehicle ‘Petershill’ consisting of hedge fund manager stakes was put up for sale in April this year due to operational, as well as performance problems.

Few would argue that our ‘feeling’ is poignantly prophetic in the current climate of financial services reform from decades-long near-implosion excesses. Another example of creative-destruction in alternatives: On shutting down one of hedge fund sector’s oldest and biggest multistrategy platform to date in July’12, Stark Investments' co-founders, Brian Stark and Michael Roth, stated “…it has become apparent to us that the financial markets have changed systematically over the past few years…” The manager started operations as far back as 1986 and at its height had US$14 bn AuM! (See link below for full story).

The starting point for creative-destruction is the mutual expectation from capital flow in terms of its demand and supply from counterparties. It is not just characteristic but almost a necessity for start-up or expansion hedge funds to have had a significant investor / partner, long-term or for specified period. Diversification of revenues and myriad other reasons suggest capital supply for businesses exist. Indeed there are specialist publicly traded private equity vehicles known as BDC’s (Business Development Companies) in the US. Similar to REITs which are vehicles that focus on real estate holdings. FPM’s radar first registered Ares Capital Corp (ticker: ARCC) as BDC.

Therefore financial intermediaries arrange stake buyers of alternative asset managers. They take the form of cornerstone or minority strategic investor / partner etcetera. Which is a matter of determining the degree of affiliation to the usually independent partnership-structured asset managers.  So clearly, with increasing institutional interest in alternative managers it is implicit that stake-buying activity is also rife.

This boom in alternative manager has systemic consequences due the ‘shadow banking’ status of them, and implications of the degree of regulation on them. Since the capital concerns of large banks presented liquidity and solvency issues from the credit crisis, a lot of the void created is now practised by hedge funds and the like.

A trend in manager-stake buying heightened to perhaps unhealthy asset-bubble levels, unfolding since the new Millennium, when "alternative investments" became an umbrella label for any investment strategy other than long-only equity and fixed income. And realistically there was an emergent systematic sophistry of the traditional long-only investing. A 'game changer's' sophistry related to having an edge in understanding and managing corporate, macro variables and/or events allied to regulatory-environment. Cynically, the ‘money game’ being a mileu's socio-politico environment and resulting legislatures and economic capital flows can be fixed!

Alternative managers are attempting to transform themselves into global players akin to the transformation of brokerage firms and traditional asset managers in the latter half of the last century. Some of them are exhibiting bubble-proportion problems in capital reserve ratios from capital destruction in the last asset boom-bust cycle. “Big is no longer beautiful!” is we believe a catchy euphemistic way of saying something is “old and non-dynamic”. FPM believes Lehman Bros. and Bear Sterns’s financial failures from sub-prime-mortgage-loans investments supports not only the thesis of diminishing trust in big banking model of global financial services; but also that size of firm does not equate with fail-safe. Ultimately, those venerable banks are prototype scenario for the creation and destruction of capital wealth. In Lehman’s case, human and financial capital built over 158 years to when the bank declared bankruptcy in September 2008. Lehman’s ‘immigrant-idealized’ origins started with an elder-sibling opening a dry-goods store, and evolving into commodities-trading / brokerage operations, as an all-male sibling founders by 1850. And growing into a global financial services behemoth with assets of US$600 bn, and eventually felled by its mortgage loans business and its systemic financial inter-connectivity.

Equally as giant trees grow and wither over longer periods, so it is with shorter cycles in other assets, such as boutique hedge fund managers. Who clearly may or may not become best-of-breed giants, but certainly the risk is that “the bigger they are the harder they fall!” Regardless of its longevity and venerability; Lehman was also the 4th largest investment bank in the US, before its collapse.

So it is poignant to note that, Hedge Fund Research Inc., reported that “…775 funds closed in 2011, the most liquidations…” of hedge fund investment vehicles since 2009. There were approximately 10,000+ single manager hedge funds and, according to PerTrac at end-2011 there were 13,395 hedge funds including funds of hedge funds. A research study estimate for the mean annual attrition rate in hedge funds is 8.67%[1], which we think is reasonable. 

We believe the creative-destruction cycles are quicker in the alternatives space. The relative rate of growth of assets in hedge funds versus it procreator or predecessor, closed-end mutual funds, is a stark statistic FPM possesses. Remember, closed-end long-only funds were the origins of hedge funds, ETFs and multitude other pooled-assets vehicles. The first such collective investment scheme in the world is Foreign and Colonial Investment Trust, started in 1868. Coincidentally, the first fund of hedge funds is known to have started almost 100 years later in 1969.  


[1] Hedge Funds: Attrition, Biases and the Survivor Premium by Robert J. Bianchi and Michael E. Drew

Friday, 27 April 2012


Hedge Fund Performance (5 years to end-March 2012)

In this research presentation, FPM Advisers serve to evaluate and share findings about hedge fund performance for the five years to end-March 2012. Investors believe it is a significant window to assess medium-term performance of hedge funds through this unique business cycle. Further we suggest that the significance of the last 5 years is in its forecasting ability for the next medium-term outlook.

From studies of business and market cycles after a housing and financial bubble, the current cycle which ensued in 2007 as a de-leveraging turning point is expected to have enduring effects, perhaps into 2017 (See Reinhart and Rogoff reference in FPM’s last blog: Head- and Tail-Winds in 2012) .
Briefly, some fundamentals suggest more de-leveraging and economic pain is necessary. Not least from over-grown national debt burdens in some developed nations, where debt to GDP is near or over the 90% unsustainable level. A level identified by the above cited economists Reinhart and Rogoff. FPM’s long-memory serves to remind us that in-vogue Spain entered the credit crisis with 40% debt to GDP, while now it is greater than 60%. Also confounding, is that the UK entered the crisis with debts at 94% of GDP! FPM understands the other forces at play, such as the question of fiscal and monetary integration in the European Union…

FPM Hedge Fund Risk-Performance Analysis

We present the risk-performance analysis of all 32 HFRI Hedge Fund Indices and the S&P 500 market proxy, during the past 5 years. Our last comprehensive analysis of all HFRI hedge fund indices was for the four years to June 2011 – see Hedge Fund Performance Since July 2007.

The colour highlights in Table 1 below displays the outliers and median statistics comparing all hedge fund and market benchmarks. The colours highlight the best, worst and median performances for a given metric (green, yellow and cyan respectively). This graphic visual helps to select from the mix of strategies and their corresponding statistics. This tool towards fund portfolio management we call “FPM Performance Comparison Tool” or “FPM PCT”.
 Table 1 Click on Image to View in Full Screen

The hedge fund indices presented in the table are sorted in descending order of Sharpe ratio performance. Top of the table is a Sharpe ratio performance of 1.47 (highlighted green) from Relative Value – Fixed Income Asset Backed strategies. (In September 2011 FPM investigated and introduced this stellar performance strategy in its research entitled Credit Markets @ Workout Inflexion Point.) At the bottom of the table is the FOF - Conservative Index, producing a negative Sharpe of -0.43, highlighted yellow. 

While the allocation decision is a complex one our FPM tools certainly makes it a simpler. Given an investor’s risk-reward preference, the rear-view mirror of performance can suggest performance expectations of strategies in given market conditions, ceteris paribus. Or else the FPM table is used to compare a customised portfolio’s performance over the same horizon.


Conservative Portfolio Allocation Considerations

A hedge fund allocator running a conservative portfolio for a treasury or chief investment office, may select low volatility investment strategies aiming to preserve capital – and by implication selecting funds exhibiting such characteristics.

Over the past 5-years an Event Driven - Merger Arbitrage strategy produced the lowest annual volatility of only 3.5%, with the median annualised volatility being 8.3%. A ‘median vol’ investment fund with diversification benefits can be sourced from the Fund of Funds – Strategic class. Similar median low risk returns were demonstrated over the 5 years by Event Driven - Distressed/Restructuring and Relative Value - Fixed Income-Corporate buckets. So a positive selection based on volatility alone suggests 5 different sub-strategies of hedge funds to choose from. Ignoring aggregated indices, the top 5 least risky sub-strategies are shown below:

Top 5 Low Volatility Hedge Fund  Strategies (over Apr’07 to Mar’12)

Hedge Fund Sub-Strategy
Annualised  Volatility
ED: Merger Arbitrage Index
3.5%
EH: Equity Market Neutral Index
3.5%
RV: Fixed Income-Asset Backed
4.1%
FOF: Conservative Index
5.6%
ED: Private Issue/Regulation D Index
5.9%

Also, perhaps there are other strategies to avoid or de-select in aiming to minimise volatility: such as Emerging Markets - Total strategies, which exhibited a high 14.7% annualised volatility over the said period. This is almost as twice as much as a median volatility strategy such as ED - Distressed/Restructuring, RV - Fixed Income-Corporate Index or FOF - Strategic Index.
We suggested ‘perhaps’ avoid Emerging Markets strategies because in fact adding the appropriate marginal weighting of a sub-strategy could be marginally incremental to absolute returns than additional risk for the said conservative portfolio. For instance, including an Emerging Markets - Asia ex-Japan strategy, with a positive Sharpe ratio of 0.13, would be a net risk-return benefit. Over the past 5 years, 0.14 is the median Sharpe ratio of all hedge funds performance.
Other strategies unsuitable for the CIO / Treasury portfolio may be the Equity Hedge - Sector (Energy/Basic Materials) Index, exhibiting 18% annualised volatility, the third riskiest sub-strategy in a mean-variance framework.

Attention Reader: Please understand that analysing indices is a similar process to evaluating the underlying or representative funds, i.e. unifying top-down and bottom-up analysis in hedge fund allocation decisions.

Important to recognise that analysing benchmarks is in effect studying averages. So imagine the complexity of the risk-return variations in the underlying hedge funds, in spite of the caveats of mean-variance framework.

* An updated version of FPM Hedge Fund Risk-Performance table using the third and final revision from HFR databases is available upon request when HFR Research Inc publishes final revision for March on May 1st, 2012.

Macro Strategy Focus

In this paradigm of fundamental shifts in macro variables of global economies, our first and foremost recommendation for inclusion in a fund portfolio is a global macro hedge fund strategy. Chart 1 below shows the ‘stalwart performance’ persistence of the macro benchmark during this fundamental economic shift paradigm.  

                                Chart 1: Click on Image to View in Full Screen

FPM’s lead series of hedge fund managers who typically employ a global macro strategy, known as the “Commodities Corporation Offspring”, are Tudor Investment Corp (Paul Tudor Jones), Moore Capital (Louis Bacon) and  Caxton Associates (Bruce Kovner).
Despite the unspectacular 2011 performance of these three managers, as reported via Reuters in Most Global Macro Hedge Funds Suffer, Brevan Howard Thrives, we believe in the swings-and-roundabout performance of these leading lights. Of the top London-based global macro managers, there is at quick-pick Brevan Howard (Alan Howard) and Balestra Capital (James Melcher).

Of the two main styles global macro trading, discretionary and systematic, both styles had a difficult year in 2011. Witness Tudor, Caxton and Moore who tend towards discretionary. FPM Excel level screen dump below shows that the systematic style had the ‘Worst Drawdown % (& Period)’ of -6% between May and June of 2011.

                               Screen Dump 1: Click on Image to View in Full Screen
 
To the author this is somewhat revealing and indicative that the systematic models and algorithms which endured the peak of the credit crisis crash produced the worst drawdown in its aftermath! Since these global macro traders digest fundamental and technical data, the difficulty in generating performance suggest there’s likely to be a prolonged and incongruous flux between economic and market conditions.  Or as Simon Kerr, an independent investment consultant succinctly considers this dichotomy in his recent blog: “…If the fundamentals are still in gear with the original trade idea, and the outcomes are being driven for the reasons looked for then the trader will concentrate on the technical position”.

As FPM noted at the beginning of this note, about ‘this unique business cycle’, we believe their predictive powers encapsulated in the last 60 months of hedge fund strategy performance. Further that the regulatory and Fed-watching for policies, whether real or rhetoric dressing, and their outcome is crucial to economic and market comprehension by traders and investors. As if on cue for this article, just as much as double-dip was augured, and as FPM like to say “Stop Press!”: UK economy in double-dip recession!”
 

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

...Something More About Head- and Tail-Winds

Presented here are more provocative and sufficiently joined-up thoughts about market forces from the editor of FPM. Originally written before Christmas, but now posted with editorial screening. Also tempering health warning on the blog: this article published for highlighting prescient factors in the economy as much as for coherency or depth of argumentative analysis. 

While foreseeable indications point to more headwinds for the capital markets and economies in 2012 (as considered below), then by implication potential upside surprises is also augured. As someone who also doesn't like talking in absolutes I hope that makes 'hedged sense'. The below prescient comments makes up the body of the series on investment climate. Commentary continuing from Headwinds and Tailwinds: An Opening Salvo... ,which endorses FPM's wish to see Ron Paul nominated as Republican presidential candidate, and perhaps even President by the general elections.

Markets, Plays and Players

Market bears and shorts are in full parade now, projecting their managed-down realistic expectations about the corporate and economic climate outlook. At the same time globally concerted and unilateral policies are continually being hatched by politicians to restore confidence. Confidence is still fragile after the downturn from housing- and credit bubbles which started four years ago.  Amid the deleveraging cycle, it’s not inconceivable to witness a sudden turnaround in sentiment and subsequent upside extending towards pre-Lehman highs. This low probability optimism stems from belief that policy makers may produce a bold panacea to quicken deleveraging, such as addressing structural issues by say introducing inflation and consequent debt destruction. At FPM, we believe the benchmark S&P 500 moving down to 1,076 is the next support level more likely to be tested on the downside, more so than the 1,255 resistances on the upside. The latter resistance level is evidently the pre-Lehman high set on 15th September 2008.

With such uncertainty capital market investors staying on the sidelines seems prudent. FPM believes there are select asset classes which are recession-proof. In circumstances where the cornerstones of investment performance, being asset allocation and timing trends, becomes trickier than avoiding awkward dating moments, then FPM recommends a select alternative funds exposure (‘SAFE’). Alternative Investment (AI) funds represent an array of multi-assets and myriad strategies, such as actively managed hedged equity strategies and macro funds allocating and timing between assets. Strategies which not only invest in plain vanilla equities and bonds as long-only investments, but potentially extending to commodities, real estate, and private equity and using leverage, derivatives and ability to short. FPM is supported in our general thesis of recommending select alternative funds for the foreseeable investment landscape by a master of hedge fund investing, Julian Robertson. In a recent CNBC interview he stated that the: “the [hedge fund] industry has a lot of legs because it is the best way to run money, the easy times are over."
                                                                                         
In light of global banks and other traditional lenders having been choked-off by new reserve capital requirements of Basel III and against a sovereign debt crisis, the shadow banking sector still has firepower and liquidity.By shadow banking system I refer to financial firms that practice global banking activities, which includes hedge funds, private equities, insurance companies, regional banks etcetera. Google plight of American insurance giant AIG, and Spanish & German regional banks in the financial crisis to understand their roles in the new financial services structure. So established asset managers and start-up ones as successful asset gatherers are increasingly taking up the capital-void left by investment banks. For example, hedge funds which are traditionally organised as proprietary trading desks are also making private equity and bank style loans. Remember hedge fund personnel often wear their investment bank experience as a badge of honour, highlighting the offshoot nature between global banks and shadow banking protagonists. See also FT's op-ed on 28th December:"Traditional lenders shiver as shadow banking grows"

FPM believes this defragmentation in the source of investment capital is an important development; a trend multiplied at the turn of the new Millennium.  No longer a core of ‘bulge bracket banks’ and other investment banks bear the risks they raise with lending and investing activities. Notwithstanding the influence of colossal players like Fidelity, Vanguard and Pimco as real cash investors. Risk being raised, sliced and disseminated too widely is at the heart of the financial crisis. The ability to break-down and transfer credit risks in debt / loan transactions via structured products, such as ABS and CDO products, DID MITIGATE WHOLSESALE DAMAGE to the banking system in the current credit crisis. That is, the whole global banking system was brought to its knees due to counterparty solvency and collateral quality concerns like that of Lehman and ABS, respectively. Hence the governments of Europe and US were opening up special liquidity financing window via EFSF and TARP etcetera. Instead of wearing the credit risk intermediaries raised, they were able to spread it via CDOs and the like in the fragmented shadow banking world and causing wider systemic consequences.


Head-winds:

 Sovereign Liquidity and Solvency: National debt restructuring speculation is expected to continue to be a fundamental driver in credit markets, and therefore by its significant size and threat of credit event the wider capital markets.

End-November 2011 European sovereign debt auctions reflected severe liquidity strains: Italian and Belgium 10-Year Yields Hit Euro-Era Highs. The sovereign debt burden of the Eurozone is not the only negative newsflow hampering the markets. US woes about Congress and Senate passing bills to extend and manage the national debt ceiling, currently above its constitutionally designated $15 trillion, is also major weighing heavy on investor sentiment. Most investors believe the reserve currency status of the US Dollar will ensure “at-any-cost” policies being enacted, despite the partisan politics and drama in negations.

e.g. Lithuania’s fifth largest bank, Snoras, was nationalised as Lithuanian authorities shut down the bank after it observed irregularities in the bank’s operations.

“…Hungary could become central Europe’s first casualty of euro zone crisis. Growth is poor, debt is high and a credit ratings downgrade to junk is likely. Disquiet over government policy is a problem and risks of deleveraging by Western banks are large. Hungary needs IMF funds.”

“…Cypres  acceded to the Eurozone in 2008, but it's already in a heap of trouble. A recent loan agreement with Russia of €2.5 billion will keep it afloat for a few months into 2012.” [Another Eurozone Country Bites the Dust]



Corporate defaults:  The global corporate default rate is expected  to increase to 2.4% from current 1.8% in 2012, with U.S. media and advertising and European business services companies worst affected, according to Moody’s Investors Service in a December 2011 report. There was a “considerable rise” in defaults in November, with 10 issuers rated by Moody’s missing debt payments. So far, 31 companies have defaulted this year compared with 55 during the same period last year.
Notably, these are not just small start-up failures. For example, MF Global was a $41 bn US broker-dealer who filed for bankruptcy on 31st October 2011, becoming the 8th largest bankruptcy in US history.

Stop Press: Saab declares bankruptcy as GM blocks Chinese deal. FPM is again on the money, focusing on the pertinent issues without blinkered parochial view!
Why does the market concentrate on one story at time?


Currency Wars: The manager of the world’s largest currency hedge fund FX Concepts believes the Euro currency is in “death struggle”. FPM cites this as one of many fundamental macro trends to identify and exploit in this dynamic global economic milieu. The long-term downward trajectory of the US dollar, mitigated by its reserve currency status, is another such trend. Also, the mean-reversion and fundamental re-rating plays in the Euro is inevitable (in its current form or re-structured form). Currently, the Euro at $1.34 is trading above its life-time average of $1.2044 because of debt purchases by the European Central Bank and European financial institutions repatriating funds.

Baltic states and other emerging countries re-aligning their exchange rates to reflect stronger and growing economies is of course another trend.

Radical Fundamentalism Wanted from US Presidential Elections: Unless real political and economic reforms are delivered to address US sovereign debt, yet another painful and steep deleverging cycle is anticipated. Another economic downturn precipitated by destabilising events, such as an unexpected Eurozone sovereign debt defaults / restructure, especially debts of the largest Eurozone sovereign borrower Italy, whose credit-risk premium may peak to unsustainable 7-8% levels.  See FPM’s take on the November 2012 general elections via a look at the Republican presidential nomination candidates, "The man we’re backing for president". With updated headline-value reinforcing demand for new era politics from those most concerned about their futures: Ron Paul Just Nabbed Iowa's Biggest Youth Endorsement

US Recovery Was Made in Washington: It has been hailed that the equity market and economic recovery from the 2007-09 recession was “Made in Washington”; through various quantitative easing and liquidity financing. QEI- and QEII–type liquidity pumping has helped to stabilise capital markets from a state of catharsis. The Fed purchased $2.3 trillion in housing and government debt in two rounds from December 2008 to June 2011. FPM without being cynical asserts that ‘policy smoke and mirrors’ were used repeatedly to support S&P 500 plunging by 20% from highs pumping liquidity to stimulate economic activity thus averting prolonged or double-dip recession (defined technically as a bear market); and by. In the UK recessions are generally defined as two successive quarters of negative growth.

In not precisely addressing the real issues of a major housing slump, financial crisis and now unfolding sovereign insolvency, the Volker-crafted Greenspan-era fixes are only as sustainable as national debt levels are manageable. FPM asserts more decisive ‘real pain policies’ are needed to counteract corporate and consumer profligacy and revolving government administrations passing the buck, in recent business cycles. The buck stops here!

Promptly raising interest rates should encourage profitable lending on the money supply side, and credible borrowing on the demand side by both consumers and corporations. Leading to high-yield seeking capital investment projects, and greater propensity for consumer savings generating much needed capital on the supply-side. Cheap money only means lower investment hurdles characterising prolonged Japan-style deflation and stagnation.

Current economic policy of providing low-cost re-financing via public finances is only assisting those corporate and individual entrepreneurs who borrowed and lent irresponsibly if not greedily. Their irresponsibility is being propped-up. Creditors should eventually be forced to write-down their investment interests in what is materially at the end of the day only inflated paper-money valuations i.e. trillions of currency in aggregated computer systems (data centres) or accounting book entries referencing real / absolute and synthetic / abstract investment returns. Which as the saying goes is not worth the paper its written on! De-leveraging is supposed to result in lower valuations. A cycle that can unfold over an agonisingly long-time like the Great Depression to clear itself, only if dynamic creative-destruction is held-up by status quo preservation. 

Instead of slow implementation of Dodd-Frank measures to give time and relief to debt-burdened entities, those watch-dogs and their over-sight policies with real teeth should be enacted immediately.  At the moment the weak corporations and sovereign countries are being picked-off by vulture-enterprise, bond vigilantes etcetera. If not directly causing a default or restructuring, these shorts-and-bear investors are certainly heightening anxieties among real cash investors. The latter of whom are therefore left perplexed and scratching their heads, at least according to the editor of this article on his meetings with the investment crowd.

P.S. Yet another sign of stalling recovery is that US domestic profits of non-financial corporations increased only $17.4 bn in the 3Q11, compared with an increase of $80.8 bn in the second quarter. Stark!

People Revolution Against Crony Capitalism: In times of national economic strife inter-government politics and indeed between debtors and creditors, and other cosy good-times fostered relationships become fraught.  Mis-allocation of resources from ingenuous economic enterprise should not be financially supported by national governments at the expense of its future generation tax burden. Voters in 2018 can expect to be a heavy taxpaying citizenry. A democracy run by government promotes individual freedom for its citizenry; otherwise rulers and society are organised and designed towards wealth creation for a minority of corporations and its core owners. This evidently is a plutocracy – not really a characteristic of a true and just democratic social organisation of people! This has also resulted in great inequalities in wealth distribution, in many nations and NOT FORGETTING that in a wider global historical perspective too. Witness the recent world-over civilian unrest, especially at the heart of modern capitalism through the nexus of Occupy Wall Street and we are the 99% protest movement. Even in London, United Kingdom, where human tolerance, social welfare and relative socioeconomic-geopolitical are stable there were looting and rioting in major city streets during August.

Wilting Confidence / Sentiment: We all know the importance of confidence and sentiment in economic decisions, and especially for propping up a house of cards. For instance, the Euro crisis causes continuing drop in confidence. Eurozone economic sentiment declined for a ninth month in November 2011 to hit a 2-year low, as heightened sovereign debt crisis coupled with weak global growth took its toll on confidence. The economic sentiment index fell to 93.7 from 94.8 in October, a monthly survey conducted by the European Commission showed. The reading stayed below the expected 93.9 level. There was a broad-based deterioration in sentiment across the sectors.

Caution Over Dotcom-Era Type Hype IPOs: In a light issuance environment for raising equity capital, the supply of issues could be expected to be of high quality and successful. Zynga and Groupon offerings demonstrate renewed difficult business climate following rebound in IPOs in 2010, and company-specific risks in e-commerce business models. For example, in November the three-year old website broker Groupon made headlines after raising $700 mn from its IPO, which valued the company at $12.6 bn. Following a dramatic first day boost (November 4th), to above $31, the stock price at writing is $22.25 (December 12th close). IPO price was $20.
  
Housing Recession is the Elephant in the Room: Since house prices peaked in mid-2007 the US housing-led credit boom and bust continues to be a drag on its economy, and by implication elsewhere too. A picture speaks a thousand words, as below: 



By understanding how much further residential house prices have to fall for the market to clear itself, FPM seeks to gauge  any turnaround possibilities in the world’s largest economy and its related US$ 11 trillion bond market, that of US mortgage securities. While there are many versions of HPI*** data, and analysis about house price inflation fuelled by reckless lending to facilitate demand from yield hungry mortgage security investors.
Currently there is a slow clearing process in the US housing markets thats about delinquencies and foreclosure practices, while mortgage resets have taken a backseat. The price of housing loans will be relevant in 2012. As unemployment situation and further house price correction takes its toll on mortgages and their securitised products. For example, delinquencies in securitised Alt-A mortgages were seen rising sharply, with Credit Suisse forecasting US$2.4 trillion of Alt-A mortgages in existence at the beginning of 2010. Also that most of these were due for rates reset in 2012. ***An FPM Monitor Situation*** 
Since foreclosure crisis is is expected to shift from subprime mortgages to outside of the housing sector, losses are also expected in the largest US$3.5 trillion commercial real estate.


More than following national price levels FPM Monitoring are watching data on job growth, mortgage purchase applications, housing starts, consumer sentiment and homebuyer traffic pointing to improvements in the housing correction. An asset bubble deflating is in fact the factor auguring protracted low growth economies. Despite the drawn-out and seemingly immense crisis in the Eurozone, this is only a side-show detracting from the US housing-led bubble.

> Data Point: The national foreclosure rate was 3.48% in September 2011 according to California-based business analytics provider CoreLogic



The Unemployment Drag: While official US unemployment exceeds 9%, notwithstanding higher unofficial estimates, policy makers have this aim of crucially reducing it, while juggling with set targets for inflation and keeping the lid on it.

Only Chicago Fed President Charles Evans has publicly supported the idea of allowing consumer-price increases faster than 2 percent annually as a way to lower unemployment. The interest-rate commitment should be contingent on joblessness falling to around 7 percent or 7.5 percent as long as inflation stays below 3 percent in the medium term, Evans said in September. Fed policy makers aim for long-run inflation of about 1.7 percent to 2 percent.

 Unemployment is also a stupendous problem in Eurozone countries, especially those that are at the core of the debt crisis. Spain’s jobless rate jumped to 22.8%. Among 16 to 24-year-olds, it’s a staggering 51.4%, up from 18% in 2008 when Spain’s crisis began with the collapse of its housing bubble. In Greece, youth unemployment reached 46.6%. In Portugal, it’s 30.7%, in Italy 30.1%.


Tail-winds:

Private sector credit workout moves unabated: Global credit management arm of Blackstone, GSO Capital acquired the   largest manager of leveraged loans in Europe in September 2011.

Orderly Mechanisms of Credit Default Swaps: While recent credit events have convened ISDA’s CDS determination committee there has however been orderly auctions and settlements, despite counterparty credit-risk concerns about contingency payouts.

Converging Traditional and Alternative Asset Management Practices: The expected trend in merging practices of traditional long-only investing firms such as Fidelity and Vanguards with savvy and flexible alternative asset managers, such as hedge funds and private equity is well underway. For example, lower management and performance fees for hedge fund investors, down from the heralded 2/20 fees, is a clear trend. This is inevitable as lower absolute returns of hedge funds, investing in severe market dislocations, makes 2/20 seem onerous. Also, 2/20 didn’t matter so much when annual returns were double-digit, and still irrelevant for hedge fund big-hitters delivering alpha performance, who will be entitled to charge premiums.   Together with other technical reasons like lower yields from low interest rate environment, and increasing supply of hedge funds, means annual performance expectations lowered. Consequently, “after years of poor hedge-fund performance, some pension managers are demanding better terms, including lower fees”.

Emerging Markets Emerge and Frontier Markets Come to the Fore:  Many expect the drivers of global growth to be from BRIC type economies, as consumer deleveraging and subsequent disincentive for corporate capital investment in developed economies stalls global economic recovery. FPM concurs with view that Brazil, Russia, India and China with other smaller emerging economies can continue to grow their undeveloped industries and markets. Even more optimistically, by 2015 i.e. 8 years from onset of crisis, FPM believes the mobilisation of consumer demand from these heavy populous countries will substitute for stymied western consumption.
FPM would also add another large population country to the BRIC acronym, conveniently coined by Goldman Sacs: Indonesia would enhance the acronym to ‘BRIIC’.

CDO / CLO & Other Structured Products: The accruing performance fee feature of ABS- and CDO-like structured products makes them still performing assets, with caveat about underlying asset quality. Not so toxic assets as initially labelled after the deluge of credit downgrades and subsequent fire-sale re-rating of valuations.  As witnessed by the amount of M&A transactions where cash-rich asset managers have been gobbling-up specialist structured credit managers .

Like vultures hovering to feed on the bounty of a large animal carcass, so it is with distressed asset managers circling European leverage loans and sovereign debt sell-off. The vulture analogy is not meant negatively but one to describe utmost practical functionality i.e. scavenging is useful in cleaning up decaying matter efficiently. Similarly, non-performing loans are acquired and serviced by investors in exchange for property or material rights the debt bestows. A vital creative-destruction process in capitalism, maybe an antithesis or corollary to private equity activity of build-and-harvest.

Regulatory Arbitrage From Reforms and Retribution: Incumbent politicians and their regulatory bodies are fighting to keep their nation state from sliding into debt difficulties. Governments have to do battle with creditors who desire to preserve their wealth by keeping debt paper values whole. At the same time alternative investors or shadow banking entities are speculating on the next hand that policy makers’ will play. Their speculation via CDS on bank and sovereign debts is evidently bringing governments and banks to their knees, at least in the theatres of the Eurozone and US credit banking. Witness yield spreads movement on sovereign debt following policy-maker news flow this year.

Citing wider negative consequences to public assets in the form of our pensions and other saving investments there is justifiable reluctance to allow creditors, mainly banks and money managers to go to the wall and voluntarily write-down or write-off sovereign debts or other entirely. Capitalism’s doomsday scenarios arise from systemic consequences of letting strategically important global banking swallow the pain of their irresponsible credit expansion. Notice the perpetual moral hazard and its irony i.e. of being caught between a rock and a hard place.

In today’s headline terms, mainstream media supplied by vocabulary-edited editors (who in turn are dictated to government agencies of propaganda) confusingly inform professionals and public about debt ‘haircuts’ and ‘orderly’ bankruptcies and ‘voluntary’ debt defaults. Language is power and it is wielded like the sword by those who can! We all remember how ABS structured products termed ‘toxic assets’ were euphemistically re-phrased ‘legacy assets’.

Authorities have no wish to see bond and other term financing markets seize-up (like the ABCP market at the onset of US Subprime collapse catalyst). So lead-debtor-nations (LDNs) within fiscal trading blocks or otherwise, and their watchdog multi-lateral agencies such as the EU, ECB, EBA, FED, IMF, World Bank etcetera keep the banking system afloat at the behest of Ben Bernanke by "printing" bank credit. From the same revealing Henry Blodget of BusinessInsider.com article citing Mark Dow of Pharo Management:

“All that printing has made banks' "excess reserves" explode, which means [banks] have a ton of lending capacity if they want it… because the banks themselves need to deleverage: They need to build up their capital levels relative to their asset (loan) levels. And making new loans won't help them do that… In other words, most of the money Ben Bernanke is printing is sitting in bank accounts at the Fed, not finding its way into the economy. And because it's not finding its way into the economy, it's not destroying the value of the dollars that are already in circulation…”.


At FPM we have identified dealer pricing / marks in bond markets as an indicative of banking liquidity, in light of Basel III, Dodd-Frank and Euro-woes. (See video below with Troy Gayeski, senior portfolio manager at SkyBridge Capital).





FPM therefore argues that in the long-run banks cannot be supported by LDNs printing bank credits. As this will lead to and / or exacerbate structural deficits in debtor countries. Structural deficits ARE NOT advocated by Keynesian economists, only that “deficit spending is desirable and necessary as part of countercyclical fiscal policy”.

A sovereign credit default / event like Greece would be a catalyst equivalent to the sequence of events that led to the ABCP markets freezing-up as rating downgrades of structured subprime mortgage securities unfolded in 2007. The obvious difference is the scale of events; which would be a greater seismic event, as opposed to a tremor caused in ABCP short-term funding market, in earthquake parlance.

Whilst threatening liquidity financing problems via interbank 

Attorney General Expect to Reach Settlement Before Christmas
FDIC Announces Settlement With Washington Mutual Directors and Officers

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Headwinds and Tailwinds: An Opening Salvo...

On the date of posting this initial comment of a series of collective thoughts about the investment climate ahead, the US equity markets closing headline from Bloomberg is 'Dow Jumps Most Since 2009 as Central Banks Take Action on Crisis'. The investor cheer was largely to do with announcement of concerted central banks action to pump more liquidity in the financial system. An engine doesn't run without oil. 

As a contrarian to such ill-warranted and purely short-term speculative enthusiasm by market practioners, FPM is prescribing  for the discerning investors a  dose of economic reality-check from the man who doesn't 'talk in absolutes'. Yes we mean Texas Republican and Rebublican nomination candidate  for  the 2012  presidential elections Ron Paul. This article and CNBC interview with Ron Paul from TheStreet.com about today's world wide quantitative easing announced by prominent central banks, is the on-the-money dissection of existing financial policy measures (as pioneered and practised to death by the Chicago Business School professors and alumnus during the Reagan era and onwards to present day).

The man we’re backing for president: FPM supports Ron Paul as the GOP / Republican candidate for President in 2012 general elections. He is a credible, strong and self-willed politician with real reform plans to address the disastrous economic global highway "the western hegemony" is heading down. United Kingdom had such a bold leader in Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. She was making hard decisions towards much-needed economic reforms (that also admittedly introduced the unfortunate runaway capitalism of today, and blindly unchecked by her vote-pandering weaker successors).

The other front-running Republican candidate Mitt Romney is backed by  powerful hedge funds and other heavyweights. Mr Romney only has plaster-fixes for the economy which  most hedgies, such as John Paulson (of sub-prime fame), knows preserves status quo of financially exploitable opportunities i.e. creative-destruction. Radical reforms of Ron Paul's manifesto would undermine the cosy crony capitalism, and represent an uncertain upheaval in policy direction of the past 30 years or so.
 Pointedly, remember that Mitt Romney was a founding partner of global private equity behemoth Bain Capital in 1984.A shadow-banking partnership which now manages $66 bn in assets (as at end 2011),  across its various platforms. Platforms that also include multi-billion dollar hedge funds Brookside Capital, Sankaty Advisors and Absolute Return Capital. These financial affiliates pull strings in economic affairs as campaign sponsors and financiers of lobby groups. Such financially entrenched organisations and their leaders can only openly predicate a economic setup for the wealthy i.e. a socio-eco-politcal establishment organised for the benefit of the 1% of world population. Where does that leave the man on the street or the 99%ers?


In full-picture FPM style we briefly introduce the other main candidate for the  Republican nomination . Newt Gingrich is a mixed bag electioneer with persistent political pedigree with many successes and a few skeletons in the proverbial closet. 



------------------


Addendum 02 Feb 2012: In joined-up thinking FPM have incorporated two current headlines and a glue. The glue being an idea from a pertinent short-story by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, written 100 years ago and entitled "When I Was a Witch". A feminist writer who in this story imagines how she would deal with some of the 'wrongs' of her day.
So on my seeing a list of mainly capitalist financiers backing Mitt Romney for US Presidential candidate (see Federal Election Commission of USA full list), and then seeing "Texas Fund Eaten Alive By Hedge Fees May Curb Costs By Hiring In-House", I had a premonition. What if all the contributors to Romney's campaign had all their proceeds 'eaten-up' in massive promotional campaigns that came to no fruition. That is, their man was not elected for Republican presidential candidate, and instead business reformer Ron Paul was eventually elected President. This would be an ironic lesson to hedgies et al who take maximum performance fees when luck is in and then continue to collect minimum management fees when markets are against them and their investors lose out. The voting US public still have power over this premonition.They can squarely stymie the swagger of the mover-shakers protecting status quo.

Monday, 31 October 2011

The Search for Alpha: Soros of the Euro?

We know hedge fund managers are out there but are they "really out there", say with with a macro play to break-up the Eurozone's common currency the Euro? Like the one George Soros spearheaded causing the exit of the British Sterling from the European Exchanage Rate Mechanism in 1992? 

It's pertinent question for all money managers following the 3-pronged EU deal this week to address the uncertainties about the Euro debt / currency crisis:

1) Leverage the European Finance Stability Facility (from Euro 440 bn to Euro 1 trillion+).
2) Recapitalise the Banks to withstand provisions for debt losses.
3)  Debt relief for Greece of 50% from private sector debt holders.

The macro play is also pertinently linked to concerns about the the validity of alpha creation and generation in the hedge fund and wider alternatives space. That is, do managers herd around common  trades, or do they go out on a limb with research or applying other edge? 

George Soros, the billionaire hedge fund investor, renowned for his macro trade of betting against the British Sterling is well documented. What may now be mere detail and packaged neatly into the recess of memory as "Black Wednesday" should have resonance as an important lesson for today. The interpretation that the British pound was  deigned as overvalued in its entry into the ERM, from macro fundamentals research, was something that eventually undid the Bank of England. Earning Mr Soros the title of "the Man Who Broke the Bank of England", for making the astute judgement and wager, which reportedly earned him $1 billion dollars.

Similarly, Greece's entry into Eurozone was under false premise about its fiscal deficit, which was understated by as much as half of Greece's actual debt. Whether Greece’s entry was politically and discretely made expedient is for the regulators and other investigators. This malfeasance with Greek ascendancy to Eurozone membership did come to light and the 'truth outted', plunging Europe  into ongoing exacerbated currency and debt difficulties. Not to mention the spectacle provided for the public and media by the Germans and Greeks to exonerate any suspicion of misdemeanours (see picture below).


From even basic / preliminary research and insight, FPM understand there are strong possibilities for Euro restructuring i.e. of countries exiting and entering the status quo 17 member common currency union within the next 1-2 years (yes the art of forecasting is to indeed tell both the date and event not just either / or!). And over a longer horizon, that an eventual complete break-up of disparate countries making up the European Union is a probability. FPM is of the summary view that EU has once again kicked the real issues of Euro currency and debt into the long grass, through its latest bail-out plans. The 3-pronged response of the EU (listed above) awaits a few days’ market reaction before setting-in-stone the announcement at the G20 summit in Cannes on November 4, 2011. The market reaction was not good, as few days after the Greece-fix, Italy’s borrowing costs hit record highs. The next target for bond vigilantes since Greece debt default is seemingly shored-up – a pyrrhic victory.

Before emerging markets’ currencies were forced to devalue often it was preceded by an IMF-prescribed attempt to restructure internal and external deficits while the country’s central bank defended its exchange rates. Extrapolating from such market behaviour, the Greece saga is a prelude to the single currency restructure, with ironically now stronger emerging markets countries such as China  invited to contribute to the improved EFSF!

Two op-eds in the Financial Times in February 2010 serve as an FPM research benchmark for its views. The first article is by Ottmar Issing, described as “one of the fathers of the euro”, entitled Europe cannot afford to rescue Greece and the other is by Mr Soros entitled The euro will face bigger tests than Greece.

Without concerning this FPM thought piece further about the multitude of factors surrounding the Euro's break-up or restructuring possibilities, the other point of this article, as hinted in the investment feasibility note, is indeed whether there are bona-fide hedge fund managers with a long-term fundamental alpha strategies? The Euro currency break-up would be great alpha play in the creative-destruction mode. FPM expected and understands the windfall short-term trading flows on Euro policy news. Demonstrating alpha capture or simply independent thinking, global debt problems was initially unravelled by the US-housing bubble bursting through subprime sector activism by John Paulson et al.

There have been many numerous researches about hedge fund managers not seeking or capturing real alpha, and that most hedge funds are really beta in alpha clothing, with simple crowding around particular themes and plays. This paradox even questions whether active management is indeed occurring, as opposed to “closet trackers”. Please refer to excellent truth-outting investigative journalism “Don’t believe the fund manager’s hype” by Alice Ross writing in a weekend FT Money supplement in the Serious Money section.

A caveat about the much touted link between hedge funds and alpha, is that traditional long-only portfolio managers may also seek alpha strategies, or simply lead or stand-out from the investment herds. Unashamedly Bill Gross, manager of the world’s largest bond fund ($242 bn FuM) for Pimco - a subsidiary of Allianz group of companies, was on record as wagering on a rise in US interest rates this year 2011. Though this contrarian view contributed to 10 months of poor performance and hardly representing alpha-type returns, such a leading bond investor can take an “out there” view – even if on this occasion a wrong-way bet. Since Operation Twist, of Federal Reserve policy of controlling long-money rates, Mr Gross is betting on falling interest rates.   

FPM draw parallels between the evolving hedge fund industry  and the investment era at the beginning of the current Millennium. At the turn of the centuary the investment bandwagon to ride was all things "dot.com" related. An example folly of this era was when Time Warner, a respectable giant media corporation, merged with the then new and highly valued e-commerce company Aol.com. The merged company changed its name even to AOL Time Warner (Editor's texting moniker: ROFL!). In a similar way there are many new and emerging asset managers jumping on the "hedge fund" bandwagon Considering negatives, these emerging managers may be mere “me-too” players. The positive potential in these emergent managers may be to discover a unique long-term trade and attribute their name to it.  Actually discovering a novel strategy in their investment process and generating alpha would set themselves up in the premier league of instutionalised hedge funds. As John Paulson did with Paulson & Co., betting on the subprime before this financial crisis.

As a final citation about the state of hedge funds and the character of the principals behind them and subsequent investment strategies, I defer to FPM’s select gurus of hedge funds, Ray Dalio of Bridgewater Associates. In his long presentation I refer to his comments from 3.20 minutes onwards about independent thinking and alpha.

Also, this article is not simply posing a rhetorical or hypothetical question but an actual one – please email FPM (fpm@talktalk.net) if you are, or know managers, with the Euro break-up as long-term macro strategy. Who’s really out there?