FPM have been urged by its financial and non-financial relationships to
prescribe that the SAC-saga should not
fizzle out but go with a bang! SAC Capital (or yesterday renamed Point72 Asset
Management LP) and Steven A Cohen are the search-tags for those not familiar with this story. Towards an end with a BANG we are still inviting the
integrity of the US legislative and political establishment concerning the
financial sector to step forward. If the career professionals are not too
entrenched in cynical plutocratic values and have adherence to integrity then the
US establishment can step-up-to-the-plate by validating its bona fide
seriousness in policing its capital markets via the Securities Exchange
Commission fairly and effectively. With co-operation from the other Federal
agencies in the widespread insider trading probe started at the time of the
Great Recession financial crisis in 2007-08, we urge a climatic finish to SAC
prosecutions and earnest persistent efforts to weed-out and stamp-out the rife
insider trading.
In FPM’s enterprise programme entitled “No Smoke Without Fire: Of Reputation Risk”, we campaign for:
a) making a warning example of Steven A. Cohen as a proper deterrent; and b)
towards long-term solutions to a perennial loophole in securities law which
rewards cheating. This and such other financial fraud perpetrators are not
committing victimless crime – pay attention to changes in your savings
portfolio valuation!
SAC Capital's Litany
of Litigation & Proceedings
|
Mr Cohen aged 57, is at the helm
of his eponymous firm’s ignominy through a litany of insider trading investigation
and litigation, shown above. Clearly
he is not tenuously linked to that litany but responsibility-wise tethered, despite
he himself being not held accountable and charged by US Government prosecutors
- so far!
If today’s headline guilty plea and overall US$1.8 bn settlement for
SAC Capital and its entities are separately approved by Judge Laura Taylor
Swain of Federal District Court of Lower Manhattan, even then the SAC-saga is
still not put to bed! Assuming the details, as extracted and shown below, of Department
of Justice attorney Preet Bharra’s settlement is not merely for a show of
justice then we can still hope of real justice. Hope that actual enforcement
for ANY suspected and investigated systematic cheats will ensue, and that “Too-Big-To-Prosecute” is no longer a valid
“get-out-of-jail” card.
“…this
agreement does not provide any protection against prosecution or other
enforcement action against the SAC Entity Defendants, any owner, shareholder,
or employee of the SAC Entity Defendants or any other person… the agreement
provides no immunity from prosecution for any individual and does not restrict
the Government from charging any individual for any criminal offense and
seeking the maximum term of imprisonment applicable to any such violation of
criminal law.” Source: Court Documents SEC Attorney, Preet Bharara
FPM principals believe that encouraging the US enforcement authorities
and publically profiling the “high
watermark” SAC insider trading case can practically be a useful protest.
Though SAC-saga case study dilettantes are not organised and visibly
demonstrating outside Mr Cohen’s head office at 72 Cummings Point Road in
Stamford, Connecticut - yet! The SEC
Enforcement Division under the lead of the US DoJ and its haranguers has
convicted and mostly plea bargained with 80
insider trading ‘big wigs’ and conspirators, since first arrests in October
2009. While principals at FPM believe in indignant public protests, our
enterprise aim is to embark on filling and complementing the void and model
left by the DoJ in monitoring suspicious trading patterns. SAC investigation
and prosecution lead to total US$2 bn plus earned for the US taxpayer and current
and potential class-action members. There must be many institutions ready to
join class actions unless those executives fear drawing attention to their own illicit
trading activities. which are on the losing trade-position side of the much
vaunted 22-years old asset manager in the crooked SAC-mould. FPM respondents
have asked how much of the multi-billion reported settlement will actually be
set-aside for compensation of SAC-trading counterparty victims and how much
towards filling holes in US government finances?
Stop Press! As if on cue to support the FPM campaign
the cavalry trumpet can be heard in the distant, viz: SEC
Lawyer on Goldman CDO Case Describes How the Agency Wimped Out! (Hat tip
Yves, Naked Capitalism!) This is a MUST MUST READ article about the enforcement
apparatus prevalent in US Justice regarding “too-big-prosecute” billionaires,
by a senior attorney insider. In this most revealing article, a US securities
regulator veteran with 28-years SEC-service James Kidney, has a parting snipe,
describing the institutional culture there:
“an agency that polices the
broken windows on the street level and rarely goes to the penthouse floors… On
the rare occasions when enforcement does go to the penthouse, good manners are
paramount. Tough enforcement, risky enforcement, is subject to extensive
negotiation and weakening…” Source: Naked Capitalism, James
Kidney April 2014, an excerpt of his retirement speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment
FPM welcomes sensible feedback on our blogs / website. Through our work FPM is evolving from an asset advisory model to an asset management proposition.